State Senator Nancy Brataas1928-2014
  • Home
  • Beauty
  • Grandmothering
  • Through the Years
  • Tribute Wall

Nancy's genius for trans-partisan collegiality

3/28/2018

0 Comments

 
NANCY BRATAAS
By John B. Lennes, Jr. 
This post was received shortly after Nancy's death in 2014. We add it here now to celebrate and deepen her memory on the 4th anniversary of her death, in a time of Republican rule she would hardly recognize.
Nancy Brataas was a person of grace, dignity, intelligence, and humor. 

​This is a rare, often undetectable combination of qualities in Minnesota public life in any era, and the 1970’s, ‘80’s and ‘90’s were certainly no exception.


In many ways her philosophy defied conventional categorization.  As soon as people thought they had her pigeonholed, they were often proven wrong. While disquieting to shallower theoreticians, this was merely evidence of a thoughtful, many-faceted, caring and intelligent human being who made up her own mind, and sought out information and wisdom wherever they could be found.  I think it may have been another Minnesotan, Harry Reasoner, who once said (in effect) that he mistrusted party labels and political shorthands, because they all too often bunched him with people with whom he may only have shared one thought in an entire lifetime.  He would have recognized a kindred spirit in Nancy Brataas.  


I worked for and with Senator Brataas in a number of capacities: as legal counsel to the Minnesota Senate, as General Counsel to the state Chamber of Commerce, and as Commissioner of a major state agency, among other assignments.  We worked on many of the same issues, and I was both in support and in alliance, as events dictated.  These were often highly complex and contentious matters, played out not in weeks or months, but in years and decades, at the highest levels of intensity and public attention; you learn a great deal about  people when you serve alongside them in such times and circumstances.  


Senator Brataas was not an easy person to work for.  All too often in public debate, it is “enough” to prevail over your opponent, even if your opponent does a poor advocacy job.  This is particularly the case when you know “you have the votes” no matter what.  Senator Brataas rarely had that luxury ab initio, although she won her battles more often than could reasonably have been expected.  Rather, her successes were attributable to working harder, and being far better prepared than the opposition.  She demanded the highest level of performance from herself and from those around her as well.  I learned that lesson early when, after having prepared a briefing paper for her, I was told, simply, “this is not good enough; you can do better.”  So I did, and I have tried to maintain that standard ever since.  She may not have been an easy person to work for, but there could never have been a better crucible for forging professionalism. Not easy, but instead, the best.


She treated everyone with courtesy, not always a natural thing in the heat of public debate.  She acknowledged points well taken, even when adverse to her own objectives.  I never saw her descend into the pit of personal antagonism when contesting often emotional matters.


She was a genuine and reliable resource for her fellow legislators, even those who opposed her on issues, spending time to explain technicalities and occasionally recommending positions that fit the needs of her colleagues, even if contrary to her own (“If I were you, this is what I would do…”).  I am not sure that this sort of thing happens much anymore.  It was a trait she shared with several other recently departed Senators, such as my friends Win Borden and Jerry Anderson, and with Rep Wayne Simoneau, among others (Simoneau used to have a slogan framed on his wall reading “Wayne’s first law of politics:  Not all the jackasses are on the other side”).


Nancy kept a sense of perspective, and was able to be both an integral part of intense struggles and simultaneously maintain, at least in part, a detached view. For instance, after a puzzling and markedly inept bit of advocacy by a fellow Senator from her own caucus, Brataas muttered to no one in particular, “who did that guy beat?”  And there was a time when she reflected on a similar debacle perpetrated by another colleague by asking herself quietly, “I wonder what the electorate in his district could possibly have had in mind?”   


I was not privileged to have known all the various facets of Nancy Brataas.  But I knew her well enough to know that she was a great person, and that we are unlikely to see her equal again.




John B. Lennes, Jr. 
0 Comments

Nancy and the nixon years

3/28/2018

0 Comments

 
Excerpted from a letter from Tom Fowler, a Rochester friend of Anne’s who worked for Nancy on the Nixon Campaign in 1972. Tom wrote this shortly after Nancy’s death in April 2014. We post it now in tribute as her death-day anniversary approaches.
 
….Nancy was a remarkable and gracious woman, and the greatest organizational genius I've ever known.
 
I should say first-off, that I only knew her as a boss. It was a lot
different for me in that relationship as a staff member, than for you and Mark as children. She was tough but fair, supportive but never micro-managed her staff, smart as a whip, and suffered neither fools nor gamesmanship.

She was the best boss I ever had.
 
For me she was the embodiment of the word "integrity".
It's a word, and a concept, that you don't hear as much nowadays as
in the past.
 
What was her role in Nixon's 1972 re-election campaign?
 
She conceived and organized the telephone voter ID and get-out-the-vote
campaign. Looking back, the amazing thing was that such a
small group of six Republican party workers from a backwater state
in the Midwest could organize such a nation-wide
impact. From the starting line of June 1, 1972, six people
organized a nationwide telephone campaign
in the10 electorally key states, comprising 250 telephone centers, and 40,000 volunteers, who completed 14 million calls by Nov 7.
 
As the election turned out, all those calls didn't really
matter. Nixon won the largest electoral plurality in American
history (up to that point). Voter ID campaigns can swing a close
race by 1-2%, but Nixon beat McGovern in a blow-out, and didn't
really need our efforts to win. As far as I know, nobody ever did a bigger
nation-wide effort than that.
 
Society and technology have changed, so nobody will ever attempt
to organize a voter ID and get-out-the-vote campaign like it.
In 1972, Nancy could rely on an army of stay-at-home housewives to staff
phone banks. Today, those women's children--like you---all have
jobs, and not much time for polical volunteer work. The IBM mainframe computers we used are now museum pieces; today's political voter ID programs are based on the Internet, mobile devices, and social networking.
 
Nancy was the brains and energy behind it all; it was 100%
her conception, based on the lessons she'd learned through
the years of Republic Party organizing in Minnesota. To use
modern terms, she was a "political entrepreneur".
 
Nancy was the organization genius behind it all. She had a crystal clear idea of how every one of those 40,000 volunteers was supposed to fit in.
We were so busy that summer and fall that we didn't have any
time for the criminal foolishness other parts of the campaign cooked up.
Nancy told us just to focus on our big task ahead, but behind
closed doors she asked the top campaign managers lots of tough
questions. Sadly, they lied to her, just as they tried (for a while) to lie
to the American public.
 
I remember one afternoon President Nixon visited campaign headquarters,
and spent 5 minutes chatting with our department. Neither Richard
Nixon, nor I at age 18, was particularly good at small talk, but Nancy
smoothed everything over. She knew exactly the questions to ask to lead a
pleasant conversation. She was a model for poise, always.
 
 I was glad when Nancy sold her company
and announced she was running for the Minnesota Senate, because I
guessed it would be a lot more rewarding to her personally, than political
consulting. And it turned out that way. She was a lot more motivated by service to others than in making a dollar….
 
 
0 Comments

    Memorials

    Memorials may be made to Mayo Clinic, University of Minnesota Rochester; Clearway Minnesota—or any cause of your choosing that needs help. Nancy was here to help; she believed we all are.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    March 2018
    May 2014
    April 2014

The Story Laboratory, LLC. (c) 2016. All Rights Reserved. 
You are welcome to quote or reprint with attribution to this website and written permission from 
Anne Brataas,  [email protected]